Mr Richard Enfield - Silence, Secrecy, and the Story of the Door
Imagine London, late nineteenth century. Two gentlemen are taking their weekly Sunday walk. They are dressed impeccably. They walk in complete silence. And then, they stop in front of a door. It's a blistered, distained, windowless door in a dark courtyard. And this single piece of wood is about to crack open the greatest psychological mystery in English literature. Hello, and welcome. I'm your Director of Studies, and today we're looking at a character who rarely gets the spotlight, but who absolutely sets the stage for disaster: Mr Richard Enfield, in Robert Louis Stevenson's Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Enfield is interesting, isn't he? Because he isn't the hero. He's not the villain. He's just... the guy who tells the first story. Exactly. He is the catalyst. Without Mr Enfield, our main character, the lawyer Mr Utterson, might never have started pulling at the thread that unravels Dr Jekyll's secret. But Enfield is so much more than just a convenient plot device. He is a walking, talking embodiment of Victorian society. A society that prefers keeping quiet to finding out the truth. Spot on. Today, we're going to explore how Richard Enfield introduces the sheer violence of Mr Hyde, how he establishes the crucial theme of social secrecy, and why he perfectly demonstrates a world where gentlemen would rather look the other way than cause a scandal.
Let's start at the beginning. In Chapter One, Enfield sees the neglected door, and it triggers a memory. A really disturbing one. He's walking home at three o'clock in the morning when a little girl and a short man cross paths in the street. And Enfield uses one unforgettable word for what happens next. He says the man trampled calmly over the child's body and left her screaming on the ground. And he calls him a Juggernaut. Exactly. The word makes Hyde sound less like a person and more like an unstoppable force that crushes whatever is in front of it without remorse. And Enfield says, "It wasn't like a man; it was like some damned Juggernaut." On the surface, Enfield is heroic. He chases Hyde, grabs him by the collar, and drags him back. But he also admits instant "loathing", and the doctor who arrives turns "sick and white with the desire to kill him." Hyde makes respectable men feel violent. Exactly. He seems to drag their own buried savagery to the surface. But what was Enfield doing out at three in the morning, coming from "some place at the end of the world"? That's the revealing part. Stevenson leaves it blank. Enfield is a "well-known man about town" - the sort of phrase that hints at brothels, gambling dens, or other hidden pleasures. So while he condemns Hyde, he is also hiding a private life of his own. Precisely. Hypocrisy is built into Enfield from the start. He represents the divided Victorian gentleman long before we properly meet Jekyll.
After Enfield catches Hyde, a crowd gathers. The girl's family is there, the doctor is there. But they don't call the police. No. They threaten Hyde's reputation instead. His name, Enfield says, will stink from one end of London to the other. And that tells us everything about Victorian priorities. To a modern reader, this should become a criminal case. In Enfield's world, scandal is the real weapon. And it works. Hyde agrees to pay one hundred pounds. He unlocks the blistered door, goes inside, and returns with ten pounds in gold and a cheque for the balance. And the cheque bears a famous name: Dr Henry Jekyll. So Enfield makes the obvious assumption. Blackmail. He even calls the place "Black Mail House". Exactly. And from that suspicion comes Enfield's most revealing idea. He says, "I make it a rule of mine: the more it looks like Queer Street, the less I ask." Meaning the more socially dangerous it looks, the less he wants to know. Yes. Then comes the brilliant simile. "You start a question, and it's like starting a stone... and presently some bland old bird... is knocked on the head in his own back garden and the family have to change their name." It's a perfect image. Questions create an avalanche, and in that avalanche reputations are destroyed. So Enfield's policy is basically: see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing. Exactly. He and Utterson even seal a pact never to mention the business again. Stevenson is using Enfield to expose a whole culture of silence. By protecting reputation above truth, respectable society gives Hyde room to operate.
Enfield matters structurally as much as thematically. He is Utterson's foil. Utterson is dry, self-denying, and dutiful. Enfield is the younger, flashier man about town. Yet they keep up their silent Sunday walks. Stevenson even says they seem relieved when a friend appears. Which makes them sound like the least lively double act in London. Exactly. But the contrast matters. Enfield represents complete non-interference. He sees Hyde, suspects blackmail, and still walks away. Whereas Utterson can't. Once he hears the story and links Hyde to Jekyll's will, he has to investigate. Right. Enfield's anecdote is the spark. Without it, Utterson would never connect Hyde to the trampling of the child. And Utterson says, "If he be Mr Hyde, I shall be Mr Seek." He breaks Enfield's rule and rolls the stone. Then Enfield returns for one more crucial scene: Incident at the Window. He and Utterson see Jekyll sitting at an upstairs window, looking like a prisoner. They try to cheer him up, invite him for a walk - and then his face changes. The smile vanishes, and the window slams down. Exactly. The two men leave in silence. But this time it's not polite silence. It's shock. And the chapter ends with Utterson crying, "God forgive us, God forgive us," while Enfield simply nods and walks on once more in silence. That is the point. Even after seeing something horrifying and almost supernatural, Enfield's instinct is still silence. No questions. No confrontation. Just denial.
So, how do we pull this all together for an exam or an essay? Mr Richard Enfield only appears in a couple of chapters, but his shadow falls over the entire novel. First, he's the messenger. He literally introduces the violence of Hyde to the narrative with the story of the trampled girl. Good. Second, he establishes the theme of hypocrisy and duality. He is the respectable man walking home from questionable places in the dead of night, instantly feeling a murderous hatred toward Hyde. And third, he represents the Victorian code of silence. "The more it looks like Queer Street, the less I ask." He embodies a society that allows evil to flourish because they are too terrified of scandal to confront the truth. Spot on. If Jekyll is the disease, and Hyde is the symptom... then Enfield represents the society that created the conditions for that disease in the first place. A society that values reputation over reality, and silence over salvation. So next time you read Jekyll and Hyde, don't just rush past that first Sunday walk. Pay attention to Mr Enfield. He is the guardian of the door, the keeper of the secrets, and the man who accidentally rolled the stone that brought Dr Jekyll's world crashing down. I've been your Director of Studies. Keep asking questions, keep rolling those stones, and I'll see you in the next episode.